Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Rewards System in HRM

Prizes System in HRM Part 1 The fundamental thought of HRM is first show up from 1980s; and characterized in exceptionally straightforward term as overseeing individuals in association and now in current society, innovative changes and creation of item and administrations request something other than overseeing individuals in an association (Newell and Scarbrough, 2002). The term Human Resource Management and Human Resource rose in the wake of supplanting the term Personnel Management with practically same meaning of overseeing individuals in an association; it is a conscious and steady methodology of overseeing hierarchical basic resource (for example individuals) so as to work business easily and accomplish targets which works through human asset framework including HR systems, HR arrangements, HR process, HR practices and HR programs (Armstrong, 2006). HRM frameworks can be pass through hierarchical skills to allow firms and industry to find and use existing and up and coming chances (Ulrich and Lake, 1990). Hierarchical viability, Human Capital administration, Knowledge Management, Reward Management, worker relations, Meeting Diverse requirements, bringing the hole among talk and the truth are the particular point of human asset the executives (Armstrong, 2006:8). Believe every single human capacity to be either inborn or procured. Each individual is brought into the world with a specific arrangement of qualities, which decides his [sic] intrinsic capacity. Properties of obtained populace quality, which are significant and can be increased by suitable speculation, will be treated as human capital (Schultz, 1981, p.21 cited in fitz-enz, 2000, p. xii). Inspiration 1.2 Purpose of Study The main role of this examination is to dissect the prize framework and its effect on representatives conduct in McDonalds. Besides, this exploration will attempt to assess whether reward appropriate prize framework would be the better apparatuses for improving representatives execution. This exploration examination would be led through getting to sentiment and enthusiasm of workers by circulating very much structured poll set. Based on this examination, the exploration will attempt to counsel the techniques and ideas for accomplishing representatives fulfillment through appropriate and very much planned prize approaches in McDonalds. 1.3 Objectives of study The prize administration framework is a necessary piece of present day business foundation; every single business is working through ideal usage of human asset; in this manner, worker fulfillment and prize framework are imperative factors so as to accomplish authoritative objective (Armstrong, 2009). The essential goal of this exploration is to look at the connection between workers execution conduct and prize framework with in the association. Moreover, the particular destinations of this examination are as underneath: To break down how reward framework assists with accomplishing authoritative objective and diminish work turnover. To research why prizes are basic to help representatives execution. To discover what kind of remuneration framework are for the most part actualized by McDonalds so as to propel workers. Prize framework inside an association have significant job in producing all out remuneration dependent on hierarchical qualities and targets; It assists with giving update about the significance in term of conduct and results; Well structured prize framework backing to build execution culture and positive employment relationship just as mental agreement (Armstrong and Helen, 2004). Moreover, this investigation offers data and information to help in other applicable examination and study to accomplish information and better comprehension of drawbacks. This examination targets issues on remuneration framework as well as include and discover the different options like: non-money related prizes can supplant the monetary prizes whenever applied after point by point investigation of representatives premium and necessities. This examination will attempt to see if or not; nature of administration in McDonalds relies on remuneration framework inside association. This examination discoveries and results may assists with improving comprehension between workers fulfillment execution and prize framework. It eventually serves to the new HR administrators to configuration better reward framework dependent on workers intrigue and needs. Different sort of remunerations, workers desire, representatives fulfillment, representatives needs and hierarchical objectives are the key variables of this examination. 1.4 Research Questions How reward framework assists with accomplishing authoritative objective and lessen work turnover? Why compensations inside an association are fundamental to support representatives execution? What kinds of remuneration framework are for the most part executed by association so as to rouse representatives? 1.5 Assumptions Supposition A A/0: It is accepted that there is connection between remuneration framework and representative conduct. A/1: It is accepted there is no connection between remuneration framework and representative conduct. Supposition B B/0: It is accepted that there is connection between representative fulfillment and worker reward framework. B/1: It is accepted that there is no connection between representative fulfillment and worker reward framework. Supposition C C/0: It is accepted that there is connection between representative fulfillment and quality administrations. C/1: It is accepted that there is no connection between representative fulfillment and quality administrations. 1.6 Research Structure So as to break down remuneration framework and its effect on workers conduct, this examination will survey the current and current writing under the situation of remuneration and prize hypothesis executed by different industry in section two. This exploration will likewise examine the worker fulfillment in connection with remuneration furnished at McDonalds with the assistance of essential information gathered from representatives. Thus, in the writing audit section, various hypotheses identifying with remunerations, issues on remunerations and its sorts will be altogether inspected. The third part, Research system will address theory, approach and strategies for research embraced for this examination. It will likewise clarify the testing, contextual investigation, research technique, information assortment instruments, wellspring of information and the strategy for information examination. The fourth part, Data investigation and Presentation will introduce the consequences of the ex amination in connection with segment investigation of the respondents and their fulfillment level in McDonalds reward framework. Different figures and outlines will be referenced in this section so as to make basic and itemized report on research. In the fifth part, ends and suggestions will be made dependent on information investigation and Presentation. This specialist will offer proposal to the organization (for example McDonalds) with due consultation to the consequences of the essential information and the audit of the writing. After wards, References and informative supplements will be remembered for research paper for better understanding and legitimacy of study. Part 2 Writing Review Hypothetical Framework This part features on the writing that is accessible in the subject particularly the fundamental concern and points of the exploration is to essentially concentrate on the connection between association objective and its prize arrangement of chose drive-through joint. It incorporates writing with respect to speculations on the subject and survey of the watched proof of past examinations. With respect to concern a few books, articles, diaries, research considers have been looked into in this subject. The primary targets of the writing survey is to discover what examination contemplates have been led in ones chose of creating research structure. Along these lines the past examinations can't be in secret since they give the establishment of the current investigation. 2.2 Conceptual Framework Before getting into the center topic of Reward framework in benefit making association, it is basic to be familiar with the general idea of remuneration, advantage and other related points and general profile of association. To comprehend it better, the accompanying areas and sub-segments will look at the theoretical matter of the prize framework and give brief presentation of the association under exploration. 2.3 The setting of Reward the executives In 1960s and 1970s the fundamental driver behind acquaintance of motivator plans was with fabricate way of giving specialists wages and pay rates during a period of government controls (Bowley et al 1982). Because of absence of appropriate methodology and strategies, some of bosses increase diminished expense and even underneath half of expanded results; in 1980s and 1990s the idea of paying individuals was changed where laborer were paid for their exhibition as opposed to participation; likewise tax collection strategy was marginally changed as lower rate in annual duty (Marchington and Wilkinson, 2005). Installment framework has been definitely changed in Britain in the course of the most recent twenty years and heaps of ideas are risen corresponding to pay and compensation which are straightforwardly in charge of the executives; comparably, in USA, another idea of installment has developed under the rubric of the New Pay. This new example has extraordinary impact on Britains the b oard practice and government too (White and Druker, 2000). The new example of contemplating New Pay in Britain is reward the board (term utilized by Armstrong and Murlis 1988) has same administration concern. At that point, these ideas fall upon two grounds: 1) compensating representatives for work done and 2) compensation framework to be restrictive upon business strategy. Moreover, the enthusiasm for remuneration framework idea had been supported by IPD proficient schedule which remembers heaps of unit and title for worker reward and a particular course book (Armstrong, 1999). The new schedule by IPD gives higher accentuation on remunerating representatives and workers fulfillment towards work. Be that as it may, this all encompassing methodology of installment has not, until now, reflected in scholarly writing, where discussion emerges between smaller scale financial matters writing of work market analysts and human asset writing. The previous concern was about impact of pay on entire economy and effect on expansion, nudge

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Developing country Essay Example for Free

Creating nation Essay Why we need to let our insight to another person obscure to us. Why we need to make our country into a question mark. Work for our country work for us let our group of people yet to come be a created country. We are positioning in a timberland place both in economy and in creating. So mind is our so why we need to deplete to other people. So get into it to work for our country. Jai rear. Rate this: +3 - 2 The idea of ‘brain drain’ is of an ongoing one that has ever firmly developed since the most recent couple of decades. The expression ‘brain drain’ alludes to the expanding inclination of the youthful, fiery, fit and skilled young people of a nation to relocate to another nation looking for their fortune †rather better fortune. They spurn their country for they look for better open doors in different nations. This has gotten a trademark a greater amount of the scholarly people of the nationâ€the specialists, engineers, researchers, M.B.A’s, C.As, legal counselors and different experts. Interest in instruction in a creating nation may not prompt quicker monetary development if countless its exceptionally taught individuals leave the nation. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) gauges that India loses $2 billion per year on account of the resettlement of PC specialists to the U.S.[45] Indian understudies traveling to another country for their higher investigations costs India an outside trade surge of $10 billion every year. Our nation is progressively being denied of its scholarly limit. Mind channel is additionally viewed as a financial expense, since exiled people as a rule take with them the portion of estimation of their preparation supported by the legislature. Our country, if this proceeds, will be rendered mentally devastated and inept. This, thusly, is prompting an incredible loss of National riches. Be that as it may, have we at any point thought of the purposes for such an extraordinary development of cerebrum outside the nation? Like consistently, we want to harp upon the issues instead of discover an answer. For what reason does India, an extraordinary and tyrannical country in Asia, need to face such a grave and major issue? For what reason is our childhood charmed by the more bizarre glades and skylines? For what reason do they like to try sincerely and be straightforward there, rather than here?The first response to this issue is that we have.. no designs to come back to India. The reasons aren’t difficult to comprehend: a liberally paying activity in an incredible expert condition. In any case, Bandyopadhya, isn’t alone who has chosen to remain back in the US. Indeed, he is only one among 94.8 percent of Indians who concentrate abroad to win doctorates in science, building, and wellbeing and don’t get back as indicated by an examination study discharged in October 2012 by Wan-Ying Chang and Lynn M. Milan of the National Science Foundation. The investigation, on the off chance that anything, is most recent proof that ‘brain drain’ isn’t stemming, something over which our policymakers must consider on the event of ‘National Science Day’. In 2010, India with an expected load of 11.4 million exiled people was just second to Mexico (11.9 million) as a wellspring of foreigners, as per an examination paper, ‘Indian Human Resources Mobility: Brain channel versus Brain gain’ distributed in 2012. India and the Philippines gracefully most remote prepared specialists and medical caretakers to the English-talking nations inside The Organization for Economic Co-activity and Development (OECD). Refering to absence of development openings in the nation, Dr. Sudeshna Mitra, right hand teacher at IIT Kharagpur focuses, â€Å"It is genuine that a great deal of progress has been made at the foundation level in the course of recent years yet in the event that we contrast it and the created nations of the world, it is as yet not sufficient, henceforth it will be extremely troublesome on our part to stop eager individuals leaving the country.† Cerebrum channel works both inside and outside the nation. Dr. Arvind Agrawal, educator at Department of Sociology, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, says, â€Å"There are two sorts of mind channel going on in the nation. The first is the inside and the second is the outside. Undoubtedly, it is for the most part limited to the states. A state like Rajasthan which has shockingly a rundown of numerous great schools yet needs great English medium universities, subsequently understudies in the wake of finishing their school instruction move out to large urban areas and at last get settled there.† Both inner and outside mind channel point to absence of chances. â€Å"External mind channel is characterized as one when understudies move out of the nation for advanced education and settle there permanently,† further clarifies Dr. Agrawal.As per the Thomson Reuters Report 2012, India’s share in worldwide research yield is about 3.5 percent. India’s biggest worldwide portion of distributions was in the field of Chemistry (6.5 percent) trailed by Materials Science (6.4 percent), Agricultural Sciences (6.2 percent), Pharmacology Toxicology (6.1 percent) while the relative offer in the field of Physics and Engineering was 4.6 percent and 4.2 percent individually. One of the most influenced areas is hereditary building and biotechnology which adapts to deficiencies of junior staff, as around 90 percent of post-graduates in this field go to the US after culmination of their investigations in India. The nature of a nation’s advanced education vests in the innovative work, which in India’s case likewise is a region of concern and a central point for cerebrum channel. Agreeing with the abovementioned, S. R. Ahlawat, teacher at Department of Sociology, M.D University, says, â€Å"We have not had the option to give the correct sort of research condition wherein the understudies can truly add to upgrade their knowledge.† India with 68,000 understudies in 2009 represented the biggest number of outside understudies in the territory of Science and Engineering in United States, trailed by China with 54 000 understudies as indicated by the ‘Indian Human Resources Mobility: Brain channel versus Brain gain’ look into paper. â€Å"Developed nations give great condition and simple availability to personal satisfaction which incites individuals to get settled there permanently,† cautions Ahlawat at M.D University. Indian Universities have all things considered neglected to figure in the rundown of top 200 instructive establishments of the world as indicated by the QS World University Rankings for 2012. The Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) rankings †the most presumed worldwide rankings of establishments for advanced education had included IIT-Bombay in 2010 which was positioned 187, however dropped to 227 of every 2012. Featuring the answers for conquer the situation, Dr. Agrawal at Central University of Himachal Pradesh, says, â€Å"Most of the state colleges are run on political obstruction which goes about as an impediment in the development of these organizations, subsequently it is a high time that there ought to be a similarity to request and development and the prime center ought to be to advance essential and basic research to spare the quality.†

Monday, August 10, 2020

Top 10 Ice Breaker Activities for Meetings, Training, and Team Building Sessions

Top 10 Ice Breaker Activities for Meetings, Training, and Team Building Sessions Whenever you’re faced with a situation where you’re in a room with random people, you can feel a little cautious. Meeting and training sessions can be awkward. Even when you’ve spent a lot of time working in a team, you might realize you don’t really know the people around you that well.For these moments, ice breaker games and teambuilding exercises can be a great way to kick-start things. While there are plenty of bad games out there, the following ten are sure to break the ice and help the team become better at communicating with each other.1. FIND THE COMMONALITYThe game is a perfect team bonding game.Setting upYou’ll need a group of people divided into pairs or larger groups of three to five, depending on the group size. You can play this game in any office setting.The game will take around 10 to 15 minutes to finish.The premiseThe groups or pairs will have to take a few minutes trying to find one thing they have in common. This could be a thing they have or something t hey like doing. You can even make it about statements they both agree with.However, it can’t be something obvious such as that they both have a nose or they all work for the same company.You also don’t want it to be something broad, such as that they both love to eat. Better commonalities would be things like “We both liked Band X in High School” or “We both made our first travel abroad at the age of 20”.Once you’ve given everyone a few minutes to think and everyone has found the commonality, each pair or group can then share it with the rest of the group.Why it’s good?The game is a great team building exercise because it focuses on finding something common rather than just sharing facts about yourself. It can help people feel more connected to each other and while people are looking to find the commonality, they’ll also share more information about themselves, helping to get to know each other.There’s also plenty of creative thinking involved. You have to think about different things you might have in common, using your thinking and communication skills along the way.You can add a bit more fun to the game by having each team “act out” the commonality in the end with the other teams trying to figure out what it is. Think in terms of charades. Teams can then get points for a right guess.You can also tweak the ice breaker game by having the groups or pairs list five commonalities instead of one.2. TWO TRUTHS AND A LIEThis is a great game for getting to know each other.Setting upYou can do this with any group of people in an office space.The best is to let people sit in a circle but any formation that allows them to see each other would do.The game takes around 15 to 30 minutes, depending on your group size.The premiseEach person has to think two truthful statements about themselves and one lie. These can be about anything such as things they like, things they’ve done and so on.You want all of them to sound plausible, as you don’t want the lie to stand out as an obvious untruth. For example, “I’ve been to the moon” wouldn’t see very plausible while “I broke my back at a skiing accident” could well be true.You will then go around one by one, each person saying the statements aloud. Once the person has made the three statements in a random order, the rest of the group will try to guess which one is the lie.Why it’s good?This is a great ice breaker game and a very traditional one to play. It allows people to get to know each other and have a few laughs on the way.It gives the team members a good way of letting other people know them and perhaps even fix some assumptions people might have made.To mix it up, you can have people write down the statements and mix the lies and truths around. Instead of two truths and a lie, people can simply make two lies and one truth.3. FIVE OF ANYTHINGFive of Anything is a classic game of team bonding.Setting upYou will just need your group of people, an office space and a pen and paper for each member of the team. You should divide the people into smaller teams of five (or smaller). It’s also a good idea to have topic ideas listed for the task.The activity takes around 5 to 15 minutes to finish, depending on the size of the group.The premiseThe teams will be given a topic and their task is to list five of their favorite things on that topic. The topics can be:Five of booksFive of moviesFive of foodsFive of languagesFive of spicesThe opportunities are rather endless in terms of the topics.Each member can write their top five and once everyone is finished, you take turns to share your favorite things with each other.Why it’s good?It’s a great game allowing people to share things about themselves and to possibly find out similarities they share. The game helps people to get to know each other while having a bit of fun.If you’re holding an office meeting, it’s possible to make the five things about the meeting’s topic. For example, five of your favourite marketing strategies or so on.If you have enough time, you can also have the smaller teams share their five favourites with the rest of the teams.4. THE GOOD AND THE BADThis is a lovely game of revealing interesting stories about yourself and finding ways to turn the negatives into positive.Setting upYou want to divide your group into pairs. If you don’t have even numbers, you can make a larger team of three or even five if you want.You don’t need any props â€" just a room for people to sit in pairs or groups.The game will take about five to ten minutes to finish.The premiseEach person will have to make a statement reflecting the most negative experience they have had. When they first make the statement they talk about the negative â€" what was so bad about the event?Afterwards, they have to focus on the good with the help of the team. Essentially, together with others, they should focus on finding the silver lining â€" perhaps something good came out of it or th e event taught them something valuable.The bad event or experience can be work related or something personal. Everyone can freely choose what they want to talk about and which event they shall pick.Why it’s good?This beautiful ice breaker game is a great way to get to know people and to create feelings of empathy. It shows that even bad things can be turned into strengths and shows the power of focusing on the positive.As mentioned above, you can have people do the activity in small groups rather than pairs. You can also make the groups think about random negative events (losing your first job) rather than everyone having to pick an event out of their own lives.5. THE ONE QUESTIONThe One Question is a problem-solving game that shows how people think in different situations.Setting upYou will need to divide your group of people into a few teams of three to five people.It’s not necessary to have a lot of space â€" just enough for people to talk amongst the group. You won’t need any props but you should prepare a list of the different situations beforehand.The game takes around 15 to 20 minutes to complete.The premiseThe objective is to come up with a single question that the team finds the best for a situation they have been presented with. In effect, you will be presented with a situation and you only have one question to ask to solve it.Here are a few ideas for the game:Marriage â€" what is the one question to ask to find your ideal spouse?Babysitting â€" what is the best question to ask a babysitter?Recruitment â€" what single question is worth asking when hiring for a specific situation?Essentially, the question is to find if a person is suitable for a specific situation or to deal with a particular problem.When you have the teams set up, you present them the situation and give them 10 or so minutes to think about the question. You can then share the solutions with the rest of the group and talk about what others think.Why it’s good?The game is a gre at way to show your creative thinking. It tests people’s ability to think outside the box and to solve problems. It will force everyone to communicate and give their opinions regarding different things â€" it will help everyone know what each other think.You can twist it around by also thinking about the one question you don’t want to ask in this situation â€" i.e. what are the things people might think about asking that are not worth it.6. SNEAK A PEEKSneak a peak is a fun problem-solving game.Setting upYou’ll need a group of people divided into teams of four to seven people, depending on the number of people available. In terms of space, any kind of office space will do and you can use separate rooms if needed.As props, you will need children’s building blocks such as Legos. You, essentially, need blocks that can be stacked and attached to each other in order to create different designs.The game takes 10 to 15 minutes to complete.The premiseThe organizer of the game should create a Lego (or building block) structure or design prior to the event. Keep this hidden from the participants at the start.Divide people into the groups and let them pick one person who will take the first look at your structure. The selected member from each team will get to view the structure for 10 seconds after which they have 30 seconds to explain what they saw to the rest of the team. The team will then try building a copy of the structure. The building phase will last just a minute.After this, a different person will go and take a peak for 10 seconds. Again, they’ll have 30 seconds to explain what they saw and the team has 1 minute to build. Repeat this process until one team builds an exact replica and wins.It’s important that there’s no talking during the 10-second peaking and no building during the 30-second explanation. The person who goes to take a peak should always be someone who hasn’t seen it yet until everyone has seen it and you can start repeating the viewers.Why it’s good?The game requires a lot of creative thinking, the ability to solve problems and great communication. The team members have to be able to communicate effectively and focus on the key points, as there is no time to waste.If you don’t have access to Lego or other similar blocks, you could make it about a drawing or even a puzzle. You can also tweak the times. For example, allow only 20 seconds for explaining or 30 seconds for the building.7. BLIND DRAWINGBlind Drawing is a game of communication and problem solving.Setting upYou will need to divide your team into pairs so this only works when you have an even number of people in the room.The game requires pens and papers so prepare those for each team.You might also want to prepare a list of things the teams will be drawing â€" these can be written on individual pieces of paper and placed in a hat for each person to draw out.The duration of the game is 10 to 15 minutes.The premiseEach pair will have one person drawing and one person explaining. The person explaining will pick an item from your list (or draw it from the hat) and then they’ll have to start explaining what it is. The person drawing will listen to those instructions and make a drawing based on what they are being told.The trick is that the person explaining cannot actually use the defining things for the thing. Let’s say they are drawing an apple, they can’t just go and say, “Draw an apple”.Furthermore, the idea is not to make the person guess what they are supposed to draw. So again, in terms of the apple, you don’t want the person explaining say, “It’s a fruit that grows in a tree”. Instead they need to guide the person through the drawing process â€" making statements like “Start by creating an almost round shape, In the middle of the to part, you want to draw a thick stick like thing.”Once the drawing is done, the members of the pair will swap places.Why it’s good?The game is a great test of commun ication skills. People need to be able to find understanding between them and communicate efficiently. It can be fun while still testing how good each person is at solving problems â€" how to make the other person draw exactly what you want.You can make this even trickier by removing words and instead of explaining the thing, the person has to act out what they want the drawer to draw.8. THE DESERT ISLANDThe Desert Island is another classic game to reveal facts about yourself.Setting upThe game works with any number of people and they can be sitting in a circle or any other formation that allows them to see each other.It should take no longer than 10 to 20 minutes to play the game, depending on how many people are taking part.The premiseEach person takes a turn to answer their Desert Island question and explain the reasoning. These are, essentially, questions about things you would take with you, do, or say if you were stranded on a desert island.Popular questions include:Who would you take on a desert island if you have to choose one deceased person, one famous person and one person from your friends or family?What book would you take with you?What album would you take with you?What item would you take with you?The person can pick just one item or thing or you can agree to allow three favorite things.Why it’s good?The Desert Island is a classic look inside someone’s mind. It’s good for getting to know people and perhaps find those commonalities between each other. It’s light-hearted fun helping to break the ice.You can make it about teams instead of individuals and have the team decide among themselves what they’d answer to each question.You can also place the questions into a hat and have everyone draw a question randomly, making it harder to pick with less time.9. THE PERFECT SQUAREThis is a fun game testing problem solving and leadership.Setting upYou’ll need a group of people and if you have a large group (over eight people, for example), you can divide them into groups of four or more.You will also need a rather large area with no obstructions (tables and chairs) because you need to group to be able to move freely.In terms of props, prepare to have a long rope for each team and blindfolds (scarfs, etc.) for each member of the team.The premiseThe purpose of the game is to create a square while holding the rope and wearing blindfolds. Start by having the team form circle and give each person a part of the robe to hold (everyone is holding on to the same robe).Each person should then have to wear blindfolds and you’ll reveal to them that they must now form a square. They can talk as much as they want but they can’t remove the blindfold.When they think they’ve made the Perfect Square, they can stop and remove the blindfold.Why it’s good?The game is a lot of fun and you will test people’s communication and leadership skills. It’s a good way of seeing who likes to lead and how, allowing people to let their communi cation skills to shine.You can make the game a lot trickier and different by only allowing the team to talk and plan before the blindfolds are put on. You can further change things around by allowing only one person to speak at a time for 30 seconds. This makes sure everyone has to take charge and lead. The person allowed to speak can then rotate every 30 seconds.10. CLASSIFY THISClassify This is a fun game testing creative thinking.Setting upYou want to divide a group of people into smaller teams of three to five people.As props, you will need to bring 20 or so everyday items that don’t have any apparent connection with each other. For example, things like toys, office supplies, clothing, cutlery and so on.The game will take around 10 to 20 minutes.The premiseThe objective is for each team to classify the 20 items into four groups of five. You try to find a unique way of grouping the five things with each other. Since the items are different, the classifications will require a bi t of creative thinking.Once each group has done this, they shall share the classifications with other teams and explain their reasoning behind the decisions. The reasons can vary from them being made from the same material to the color and so on.Why it’s good?The game can be a rather fun way of testing creative thinking. It allows people to talk with each other and reveal things about how they think when it comes to things.You can tweak this game by adding another layer to the task. Instead of just classifying, you also have to come up with a function for those grouped items.